by Francis Lewis, Executive Editor, IN NEW YORK magazine

Cattrall’s the Cat’s Meow

November 17th, 2011 by francislewis

I may be the only New Yorker who has never watched a single episode of Sex and the City. So, when I hear the name Kim Cattrall, I think of the heartbreaking 2007 BBC movie, My Son Jack, in which she played the wife of Rudyard Kipling and mother of the titular Jack (Daniel Radcliffe). Or more recently Any Human Heart, another Brit TV must-see, with Cattrall as voluptuous Gloria Scabius. The actress has acting chops galore, and in Broadway’s Private Lives, she’s in full sail. Is there a sexier actress of a certain age on the boards right now? She owns Amanda Prynne in the Noel Coward comedy in a way that I haven’t experienced before. Sure, Maggie Smith in the 1972 West End production, with her then-husband Robert Stephens, spat out Coward bon mots with the elan of a venomous viper, and Lindsay Duncan won a 2002 Tony Award for her supremely mischievous and intelligent Amanda. But Cattrall adds a ripe femininity to all this, as well as fleeting glimpses of warmth beneath the narcissist’s well-manicured, claw-bearing exterior. Delicious. Cattrall is well-matched and ably abetted by her super sexy co-star, Paul Gross, as ex-husband Elyot. The chemistry between the two scorches the otherwise decorous Music Box Theatre. (If you haven’t see Gross in Slings and Arrows, the Canadian miniseries, 2003-2006, about a provincial theatrical festival, put it on your queue.) Secondary roles are superbly cast (take a bow, Simon Paisley Day, Anna Madeley and Caroline Len Olsson), 1930s period details are impeccable (check out the braces, garters and Oxford bags on the men) and director Richard Eyre is to be congratulated for so deftly taking the Do Not Disturb sign off these Private Lives.

That Actress

October 21st, 2011 by francislewis

Julie Kavner was deliciously coy when I interviewed her the other day. She simply wouldn’t let me in on the secret in “Honeymoon Moon,” the Woody Allen one-act in which she stars on Broadway. At least not before I had seen the show. Well, I’ve seen the show, and, like Ms. Kavner, I’m not blabbing. Why spoil your fun? The show is pure schtick, but there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s the final course of a three-course meal, collectively entitled Relatively Speaking. The evening’s curtain raiser, “Talking Cure,” is a curiosity, a before-and-after story with the before coming after the after, if that makes sense. To my way of thinking, the before (second half) is far more interesting than the after (first half), and I wish author Ethan Coen had developed it further. The second course is Elaine May’s “George Is Dead,” and I liked this one best of all, thanks to Marlo Thomas. The whole That Girl phenom passed me by, and made-for-TV movies are not my thing, so this was my first real exposure to Thomas the actress. What intelligence, what timing. Of course, her character (ditzy Doreen Whittlesy) had a lot to do with it: a narcissistic woman child and May’s smart take on the classic man child. A fun evening.

Opening Night at the House Andrew Built

October 6th, 2011 by francislewis

Opening night at Carnegie Hall is always a gas. Everyone in their best bib and tucker and on their best behavior. But last night was beyond extraordinary. Not the crowd, but the sound emanating from the stage: An all-Russian program with the Mariinsky Orchestra, conducted by Valery Gergiev and featuring Yo-Yo Ma. Gergiev is a study: He doesn’t use a podium and never conducts with a baton. Ramrod straight, a strong vertical, he lets his hands do the work. The right flutters ever-so eloquently. Yo-Yo Ma is a study, too. His body envelopes the music as it does the cello, moving this way, then that; his face records every thought, emotion. But I don’t think I’ve ever felt such an interloper at a concert as I did when he descended into the depths of Tchaikovsky’s Variations on a Rococo Theme. This was Intense, personal playing, a dialogue with the composer so intimate that I felt like a voyeur, but privileged for the opportunity to witness it. What tone. The program’s bon bon was Rimsky-Korsakov’s Orientalist fantasy, Scheherazade. Whenever I hear it, I’m Sinbad the Sailor. The Mariinsky is in residence at Carnegie Hall tonight and Oct. 9 thru 11. Tchaikovsky symphonies are on the bill. Don’t miss.

Atys Again

September 22nd, 2011 by francislewis

There’s something to be said for spontaneity. I had resigned myself to not seeing Lully’s opera Atys at BAM this week, when a friend phoned at 10 a.m. yesterday (Sept. 21) and demanded, “Why aren’t we seeing Atys?” A quick call to the BAM box office, a flash of plastic and at 7:30 p.m. we’re sitting pretty in the mezzanine of the Howard Gilman Opera House. An anticipated quiet evening at home became an unexpected visit to the court of Louis XIV. Of course, Atys, the work, is anything but spontaneous. Written and produced for Louis XIV in 1676, it’s as formal and elegant a piece of music and recitative as you are likely to find on any New York stage right now; and at four hours-plus, it’s frankly a bit of a marathon. But hang in there. Under the baton of William Christie, Les Arts Florissants singers and dancers nimbly take off. The sets and costumes are sumptuous. Only the lighting seemed murky at times and unfocused at others. And if I were to quibble with the text, which I won’t, it would only be to remark, as I do whenever I talk about French arts, God bless (or damn) the French for their singular obsession with l’amour, l’amour, l’amour. I first saw Atys when Christie brought this production to BAM in 1989 and again in 1992. The current outing is visually and dramatically a replica of the previous two; only the actors and dancers have necessarily changed. Two performances remain (Friday and Saturday, Sept. 23 and 24, at 7:30 p.m.); both are sold out, but there is always the possibility of cancellations and partial-view seats are available as of this posting. See Atys. It’s a once-in-a-lifetime event that I’ve had the joy of experiencing three times.

Follies Redux

September 19th, 2011 by francislewis

As of this writing, I’ve seen three productions of the Broadway musical Follies. Four, If I count the 1985 Lincoln Center concert version. Isn’t that enough for one lifetime? (I think I’ve only seen Hamlet more times.) Those were my thoughts as I took my seat at the Marquis Theatre on Sept. 8. I had seen the original 1971 production and been less than whelmed. I know, call me both a dinosaur and a philistine. The 2001 Broadway revival is best forgotten, as I have done. The concert had its charms, notably Barbara Cook and Lee Remick. And I like the recording. But I remember in each incarnation a certain ennui setting in around, say, “Too Many Mornings.” Too many songs perhaps? Too much of a good thing perhaps? And then there is the unavoidable truth that for two and a half hours this audience member at least felt locked in with characters he didn’t much like and whose world view differed from his own. I’m no Little Mary Sunshine, but the quartet at the heart of Follies are deeply, depressingly, unremittingly unhappy at the beginning of the show, in the middle of the show and at final curtain. Worse, the original production was played without an intermission, which I remember left me benumbed halfway through. There just was no escape from the misery, not even a midshow bathroom break. Rumor had it the current production was flirting with going intermissionless. Fortunately, the powers that be reconsidered. But I wasn’t convincingly cheered as I settled in for what I thought would be a very long and drear night. Was I ever wrong. If there is going to be a near-perfect Follies in my lifetime, this is it. And if there is another revival before I flee this mortal coil, I think I’ll say, “No thanks.” I’d rather go out on a high. Chalk up my reconsideration of Follies to the actors: Bernadette Peters, Ron Raines, Jan Maxwell and Danny Burstein. Has a musical ever been better acted? I couldn’t take my eyes off Peters, who had me in tears from her entrance until her final look around the stage. Her Sally is mad, bad and heartbreaking. I wanted to take her by the shoulders and shake some sense into her, but at least this time around I understood—and felt—why Sally was such a slobbering mess. That’s acting.

Going for Baroque

September 22nd, 2010 by francislewis

It’s a sorry state of affairs, the state of French Baroque music and dance in New York City. There’s so little of it on the calendar and in the repertoire for audiences to hear, see and fall in love with. I was reminded of this last night when I ventured uptown to Symphony Space for a performance (the first of only two) of Jean-Philippe-Rameau’s Zéphyre and other ballets, presented by The New York Baroque Dance Company and Concert Royal. How serious is the dearth? Last night was the North American premiere of Zéphyre, a one-act opera/ballet from the composer’s late period (he died in 1764). Of course, the 1789 Revolution put paid to subsequent performances of this and other royal jeux d’esprit for 100 years or more. Better late than never, I suppose. Especially when choreographer Catherine Turocy and artistic director James Richman (doubling on harpsichord) presented their usual elegant, eloquent performance. The dancers were lithe and in total control, even when a costume malfunction (a descending petticoat) threatened a particularly delicate pas de deux. Talk about grace under pressure. The singers were in fine voice, too. Everything worked so well, one could not help but wish for an audience larger than the 100 or so scattered in the barn that is Symphony Space. My companion remarked that the orchestra needed to be double in size, with some percussion thrown in, and that stone walls for the sound to reverberate against would have been a gift. Alas, one can’t always have Versailles. For me, the fun was getting caught up in a confection about l’amour, l’amour, toujours l’amour. I always marvel at the magic Tourocy and Richman (both are Americans) conjure up on a shoestring. In any case, New York now has to wait six months for its next Baroque fix when France’s glorious Les Arts Florissants makes its annual appearance in NYC (Mar. 11-12, 2011 at Alice Tully Hall) with Rameau’s Anacréon and Pygmalion. If you’re wondering what the Baroque fuss is all about, find a DVD of Gérard Corbiau’s 2000 movie, Le Roi Danse, about Louis XIV and Rameau’s predecessor, Jean-Baptiste Lully. You’ll be hooked.

Promises Kept

April 23rd, 2010 by francislewis

I had a revelation sitting in my orchestra seat in the Broadway Theatre last night at a preview of the sensational revival of Promises, Promises. The show is set in 1962, the same year that I sat in the very last row of the balcony in the same theatre at a performance of the flop musical Kean, starring the great Alfred Drake. My seat cost $1 (yes, $1)! I was a schoolboy with a not-very-substantial allowance, but that didn’t stop me from loving every second. My orchestra seat last night goes for $126.50. But let’s not talk about inflation. This show is worth every penny: all 12,650 of them. Memorable tunes, witty and intelligent book, spot-on design (although no man in 1962 would have worn a summertime white dinner jacket on Christmas Eve, as Tony Goldwyn does; small gripe), brilliant dancing (Turkey Lurkey, anyone?), seamless direction. Props to all concerned—Burt Bacharach, Hal David, Neil Simon, the designing Pask brothers, orchestrator Jonathan Tunick, Rob Ashford, et al—for a stupendous job. Kisses for Kristin Chenoweth, hugs for Katie Finneran and an old-fashioned standing ovation for Sean Hayes for his beautifully sung, heartfelt, funny, moving performance as Chuck Baxter. A theatre star is born.

American Idiot’s Michael Esper: No Fool He

April 19th, 2010 by francislewis

Three friends—Johnny, Tunny and Will—set out to discover “life” in the new Broadway rock opera American Idiot. Johnny escapes to the city and shoots heroin. Tunny enlists in the military with dire consequences. And Will never makes it beyond suburbia, held back by a pregnant girlfriend and his own inertia. Portraying Will is Michael Esper. I recently spoke to Esper about the show. He’s definitely an actor to watch.


You’re the only one of the three friends who’s onstage the show’s entire 95 minutes. When you’re not interacting with the others, you’re downstage right, anchored to a couch, swigging beer, playing with a remote or taking a hit from a bong. What’s it like being adrift in your own world with this whole other show going on around you?


Those moments when I’m not participating are in some ways harder. It’s really lonely as an actor. Thankfully, it’s also lonely for the character because that’s what the character is experiencing. It requires a lot of concentration. I’ve built a journey for Will and Michael [Mayer, the show’s director] has helped me a lot with it. There’s always a life happening for me, even though it may not be the show’s focus at the time.


Like Will, you grew up in the suburbs. Any similarities?


Yes. All of the things Will experiences, I experienced intensely as an adolescent and young adult. Atrophy, disenfranchisement, sexuality, anger, the search for meaning. There was a lot about [suburbia] that was good, you know, but I had a really hard time. I felt very misunderstood, very much an outsider. I got made fun of a lot. You know, kids are mean and cliques form. I just never had the experience of fitting in with what I perceived the life around me to be., what success was, what popularity was, what ambition was. I had adversaries, but, in retrospect,t I think I also had imagined adversaries. And I think I may have fit in more than I thought I did at the time.


With it’s Green Day score, American Idiot is hardly an old-school Broadway musical. Do you have a favorite Broadway musical?


That’s really hard to say. I have a huge soft spot for Guys and Dolls. It’s not revolutionary, but there’s something about it that I just adore. I love that show so much.

Jane for President

April 16th, 2010 by francislewis

I saw Million Dollar Quartet last night—the whizbang musical about the night in December 1956 when the stars aligned and Johnny Cash, Carl Perkins, Jerry Lee Lewis and Elvis Presley met (by chance) in the Sun Records studios in Memphis and jammed for the first and only time together. Great show, great performances, great tunes. I exited the Nederlander Theatre humming … the costumes. Let me explain.

I’ve had my eye on Jane Greenwood all season. As costume designer for the recently shuttered Present Laughter and A View From the Bridge, she swathed Victor Garber in luxurious silk dressing gowns in the Noël Coward comedy and transformed a very 21st-century Scarlett Johansson into a very straitlaced 1950s teen in a shirtwaist in the Arthur Miller tragedy. To complete her hat trick this season, she clothes Cash (Lance Guest) in head-to-toe black; Perkins (Robert Britton Lyons) in blue suede shoes—hey, he wrote the song; Lewis (Levi Kreis) in mismatched stripes and hillbilly suspenders; and Presley (Eddie Clendening) in draped sportcoat and slacks befitting a new prince of Hollywood (Love Me Tender had just come out). Greenwood pulls out all the stops for the finale—the best curtain call on the main stem—when she goes Vegas and gears the boys in bugle-beaded blazers: jet black for Cash, twinkly blue for Perkins, sparkly red for Lewis and Tutankhamun gold for Elvis. There ain’t nothin’ that this period-perfect designer can’t pull off.


So, where’s the Tony Award, Jane? Greenwood’s been nominated for 15 (!) but has yet to take home the prize. Scandalous. It’s about time this genius of the theatre got her just reward. Let’s start bugging the Tony Nominating Committee and then the voters.

Snap

April 15th, 2010 by francislewis

I’m in the monority. Again. I actually found much to like in the new Broadway musical The Addams Family. I may have been the only member of last night’s audience in the Lunt-Fontanne Theatre never to have seen the 1960s TV sitcom or either of the “major” motion pictures. I had no preconceptions, other than the Charles Addams New Yorker cartoons, and like everyone else, I give them an A+. I also bypassed the reviews (mixed to thimbs-down), since I would be seeing the show post-opening night. Pre-opening buzz was another matter. The chatter from the Chicago tryout was loud and grim. Here then are some thoughts:


The show gets off to a dull start: flat-sounding, over-miked overture; pedestrian opening number; ho-hum situation. Wednesday’s in love with a wonderful guy, but unfortunately, Wednesday is a one-note samba on which to build a two-and-a-half-hour play. Her “normal” boyfriend Lucas is not much better (poor Wesley Taylor, he had more to work with in Rock of Ages). Grandma’s shtick is just that: shtick. Pugsley hardly registers; Lurch lurches around waiting for his big moment.


Gradually, however, and especially in the second act, things (including Andrew Lippa’s score) began to fly. Uncle Fester’s love song to the moon is totally wacko. Every Broadway musical needs a how-did-they-do-that number like this. The jokes by librettists Rick Elice and Marshall Brickman of Jersey Boys fame tend to the hoary, but when they land, which they usually do, it’s three-point all the way. And with Nathan Lane and Bebe Neuwirth doing the piloting, the skies are bluer than blue. Nathan avoids the Max Bialystock thing and makes an endearing—and, in his own way, sexy—Gomez. Bebe looks great and talks with a slight curl to her lower lip. You can call her Morticia the irony maiden. And when Mr. and Mrs. A finally tango, it’s magic. There may have been talk of the stars crossing swords in rehearsal, but you’d never know it onstage. They’re the loopiest couple in town. Cheers, too, to Phelim McDermott and Julian Crouch for the gorgeous sets and costumes; and special mention to puppet master Basil Twist for the monster under the bed.


Next on my agenda: Million Dollar Quartet. Can’t wait.

View Website Terms and Conditions and Privacy Statement of IN NEW YORK, LLC. Users of this site agree to be bound by the terms of the IN NEW YORK, LLC Website Terms and Conditions.